http://www.saf.org
Copyright (C) 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved ![]()
By Rick Barkett
For hundreds of years American citizens have enjoyed the right to “keep and bear arms” within the United States of America. The founders of the nation found it necessary to amend the Constitution, allowing for non-military persons to carry weapons capable of self defense, particularly referring to firearms. While there is no disagreement over the existence of the Second Amendment, there is, as with all ambiguous legal writing, a fierce debate over the true meaning of the Constitution’s creators.
A common interpretation of the Second Amendment to the Constitution follows that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” refers strictly to a MILITIA, as opposed to simply an individual. In order to understand this argument fully it is important to recognize the situation of the budding nation during the drafting of the Constitution (and the subsequent Bill of rights). There was a tangible fear of foreign invasion, as the newly formed country was vulnerable in its early stages, as well as a much greater risk of large scale internal strife (several notable ‘rebellions’ took place during America’s infancy). As such, state and local militia’s existed in almost every area of the country, acting more as a police force rather than a military unit. There is no real local ‘militia’ in 21st century America, thus, opponents of gun control argue that there is little ground to stand on when combating gun-control legislature.
Using this “interpretation” or argument against the individual’s privilege to own private firearms does not take into account other factors and opinions of the founding fathers. Using the context of a local militia to argue for gun control, against the second Amendment, is definitely not foolproof. The term ‘militia’ in the context of the Second Amendment referred to most able bodied men ages 18 to mid 40s. The militia was not a standing force; the weapons were both privately owned and stored. A local militia does not necessarily imply a government recognized organization, rather, a group of well-rounded, peaceful individuals interested in protecting themselves and their families. When taking this interpretation into a modern context, it makes perfect sense to allow individuals the right to weapons for self defense.
Thomas Jefferson and Samuel Adams both stated their views concerning the right of the individual to own weapons, shedding some light on the ‘correct’ interpretation of the Second Amendment. According to Jefferson “no free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms,” mentioning nothing of a militia. The State of Arizona’s Constitution directly includes provisions for its citizens with “the right of an individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the State.”
Another primary threat to personal freedom, that the Second Amendment was created to prevent, is the potential of the central government to become a despotism or dictatorship. A well armed population is much more of a threat than unarmed civilians attempting to defend themselves against a military force. This is an often overlooked aspect of the Second Amendment; however, it remains a critical piece to the foundation of freedom in this country. The Second Amendment gives every citizen a “fighting chance” in the event of hostility, be it from their own country or from robbery, theft or other types of crime.
Strict gun control laws negatively affect honest, law-abiding citizens of the nation, and would do little to deter those with violent intentions. A simple example of this concept exists in Prohibition, a period of time in the early 20th century where alcohol was made illegal within the United States. Most people still got their daily drinking in, the difference was the source. Many hardworking individuals who worked in or owned drinking establishments were unable to make ends meet, smugglers on the other hand made money hand over fist selling alcohol illegally. In the event of strict gun control, those who want a weapon for a shady, violent purpose would have little trouble getting hold of one. If an honest, peaceful citizen wanted one for protection, he or she would not be able to obtain a mode of self defense without breaking federal law.
Copyright ©2008 by Rick Barkett. No articles or content on this site can be reproduced or copied without written permission from rick@azccw.com.
By Rick Barkett
If you carry a concealed handgun, a good holster makes a huge difference in your daily routine. Investing in a quality product that works well with both your body and your firearm will make you more comfortable – and reduce the chances of somebody noticing that odd outline underneath your shirt or shoulder.
Unfortunately, you have to spend some time using a holster before you can be sure that it’s right for your needs. Many people who carry concealed firearms go through several holsters before they find “the one.” Don’t be surprised if this happens to you. This is normal, so don’t worry. You can always trade discarded holsters with another person, or sell them online, to recoup some of your investment.
These tips will help you narrow down your choices and make the selection process easier. Soon, you’ll find the holster that you’ll probably carry for many years.
* First you have to decide on the style holster best suited for you, ie: belt slide, inside the belt, small of back (sob), paddle, ankle or belly band, just to site a few.
* Buy the right model for your handgun. A holster for a five-inch 1911 will not work with a sub-compact .45, so be sure that you’re shopping within the correct range. Most people already know this, but it’s wise to double-check before you make your purchase. Though you can usually exchange incorrect products, you really don’t want to wait, or make a special trip, if you can avoid it.
* Don’t commit yourself to one material. Kydex, ripstop nylon and leather holsters all have the potential to be the best you’ve ever owned. Don’t eliminate a holster just because you don’t think that the material will work. You might even end up with one holster for winter carry and another for summertime.
* Pay attention to body position. If you carry inside the waistband, for example, then you can put the holster pretty much anywhere – from your navel to the small of your back. If the current holster fails miserably just behind your hip, try moving it around.
* Cant – or the holster’s angle (8-18 degrees) – is also important. You might have a terrible time concealing a “straight up and down” configuration, but what if you adjust the cant just a few degrees? Keep this in mind when you try to find your new holster.
* Be sure that your holster accommodates your wardrobe. Some waistband (beltline) holsters let you tuck in your shirt; others don’t. Different ankle holsters are better or worse with your favorite khakis.
* Accessories matter. Do you carry an extra magazine? Does your firearm have laser sights? If so, be sure that the holster can accommodate these extras.
Your friends, family and fellow shooters will probably recommend holsters that work for them. Listening to their opinions is important, but remember that each person is different. What’s comfortable on your father’s waistband might be miserable on yours.
Keep looking, try different types of holsters and carry methods, and enjoy the search. Soon enough, you’ll find exactly what you want – and you can enjoy using that holster for many years. Just be sure to take good care of your new find, and enjoy finding new homes for the rejected holsters in your sock drawer.
Copyright ©2008 by Rick Barkett. No articles or content on this site can be reproduced or copied without written permission from rick@azccw.com.